Roughly 3.2 million Social Security beneficiaries saw their monthly checks reduced for years by a provision most of them didn’t know existed. For Rochelle Kowalski, a 65-year-old school custodian in San Jose, California, discovering that fact didn’t feel like a headline. It felt like a punch.
A financial counselor named Dennis Park recommended I speak with Rochelle in early March 2026. He’d been working with her for about six months and told me her situation was one he wished more people understood. “She’s done everything she was supposed to do,” he said. “And the system kept moving the goalposts.” When I sat down with Rochelle at a Panera near her school district’s administrative offices on a Wednesday afternoon, she arrived with a manila folder thick with printed benefit estimates and a cup of coffee she’d already half-finished.
A Graduate Degree That Didn’t Go Where She Planned
Rochelle Kowalski has worked as a custodian for the Santa Clara Unified School District since 2008. Before that, she spent several years in community health administration and, in her early forties, enrolled in a Master of Public Policy program at San Jose State University. She graduated in 2007, owing $52,400 in federal student loans, fully expecting the degree to move her into a district administrative role.
It didn’t. Budget cuts hit the district hard in 2008, the administrative pipeline collapsed, and Rochelle took the custodian position because it came with union protections, health coverage, and CalPERS enrollment. She’s never fully made peace with that sequence of events.
As of April 2026, Rochelle still carries approximately $38,200 in outstanding student loan principal. Her annual salary is $74,800 — solid for the role, reflecting her seniority and union contract. But she also sends $650 each month to her younger sister in Chicago, who has been managing a chronic illness since 2019 and works only part-time.
When I asked Rochelle whether she’d ever considered stopping the transfers, she shook her head immediately. “That’s not a real question for me,” she said. “She’s my sister. You don’t put a price on that.”
The Provision Nobody Told Her About
CalPERS, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, covers Rochelle’s retirement through the school district. Because she worked jobs covered by Social Security before 2008 — including a retail management role in her twenties and her early community health work — she had accumulated enough credits to qualify for Social Security benefits as well.
What Rochelle didn’t know until a 2024 meeting with Dennis Park was that the Windfall Elimination Provision, or WEP, had been quietly reshaping every projection she’d ever received from the Social Security Administration. The WEP was a formula that reduced Social Security benefits for workers who also received pensions from jobs not covered by Social Security payroll taxes. Her CalPERS pension qualified as exactly that.
Under WEP calculations, Rochelle’s projected Social Security benefit at her full retirement age of 67 had been estimated at roughly $910 per month — down from what would have been approximately $1,680 per month without the provision. That’s a difference of $770 a month, or more than $9,200 a year, for every year she collects benefits.
“Dennis showed me the two numbers side by side on a piece of paper,” Rochelle told me. “I sat there for probably a full minute without saying anything. I just kept looking at it.”
When the Law Changed — and What That Actually Meant
The Social Security Fairness Act was signed into law on January 5, 2026, eliminating both the Windfall Elimination Provision and the Government Pension Offset. For Rochelle, the timing was almost surreal — she turned 65 in February 2026, one month after the repeal took effect.
According to the SSA’s retirement benefits overview, the repeal means workers like Rochelle who were previously subject to WEP reductions will now receive benefits calculated under the standard formula. Her revised projection at age 67 comes in at approximately $1,620 per month — nearly $710 more each month than the WEP-adjusted figure.
But Rochelle’s reaction when Dennis called her with the news was complicated. She told me she cried — and then immediately felt guilty about it. “I kept thinking, why didn’t this happen ten years ago? What about the people who died before January? They got cheated for their whole retirement and nobody’s giving that back.”
That bittersweet quality came up several times in our conversation. She’s genuinely grateful for the change. She’s also unwilling to frame it as a win without acknowledging how long it took to arrive.
The Decision She Still Has to Make
Even with the WEP repeal improving her Social Security picture, Rochelle is navigating a set of pressures that make her retirement math anything but simple. She became eligible for early Social Security benefits at 62, but she declined to claim then. Her full retirement age is 67, and she’s weighing whether to claim now at 65, accept a reduced benefit, or wait until 67 — or longer.
She currently plans to keep working until at least 67. Her CalPERS pension at that point would add roughly $2,080 per month, giving her a combined monthly income of approximately $3,700 before taxes — meaningful, but not comfortable when factoring in San Jose’s cost of living, her ongoing student loan payments of $390 a month, and the $650 she sends to her sister.
“I run the numbers every couple of weeks,” she told me. “It always comes out the same. If I live to 85, waiting is smarter. If I don’t, I gave up years of checks for nothing. Nobody can tell me which one it’ll be.”
What She Wants Other Workers to Know
Toward the end of our conversation, Rochelle’s tone shifted. She’d been careful and measured for most of our talk — but when I asked what she wished she’d known earlier, she leaned forward.
She’s not wrong that the information gap was real. The SSA’s WEP publication existed for years, but it wasn’t prominently surfaced in onboarding materials for new public employees. Rochelle said she never received anything from the district explaining how CalPERS enrollment would interact with her prior Social Security record.
She’s also thinking about Medicare now, having turned 65 in February. She enrolled in Medicare Part A automatically, and is still covered by her employer’s health plan — which means she’s holding off on Part B for now to avoid paying the premium twice. That decision alone requires tracking deadlines carefully to avoid late enrollment penalties down the road.
When I asked whether she felt optimistic about the next chapter, Rochelle paused for a long moment. “Optimistic is a strong word,” she said. “I feel like I finally understand the board I’m playing on. That’s not nothing.”
Driving back from that meeting, I kept thinking about how many workers in Rochelle’s position — public employees with split work histories, family obligations, and debt that followed them into their sixties — spent decades making decisions without the full picture. The Social Security Fairness Act helped her. But the bitterness she carries isn’t just about the WEP. It’s about all the years of planning she did without knowing there was a gap in her information.
Her folder of benefit estimates sits in her car now. She told me she checks the numbers again every time something changes. At 65, that’s become its own kind of second job.
Related: I Almost Claimed Social Security at 62 — The Math That Changed My Mind
Related: A St. Louis Bus Driver Checked His Social Security Statement at 58 — The Number Changed Everything He Thought He Knew
Leave a Reply